Do others get it right with a standard release cycle? Yes. Is PCLinuxOS and the rolling release perfect? No. It’s going to be quite nice as development continues to be able to do this. 71 to 2007 now…but the concept of seamless upgrades is still one that PCLOS developers strive for. This rebase would prevent a user from updating. PCLinuxOS was originally forked from Mandriva 9.2 and developed away from it…when we rebased this past year for 2007 it was due to glibc/GCC4 updates that our small developer team wouldn’t be able to do. This was a huge draw to me in the early days. That’s right, 3-5 releases could be upated via synaptic without incident. 71 on our boxes in the earlier days of PCLinuxOS, we found that updating all the way to. The last thing I love about a rolling release is that updates are seamless. The quality of product the dev team produces is astounding because of this. Texstar doesn’t release until he feels everything has been thoroughly tested…so much so that he often times will hold off weeks at a time for a release just to clamp down on the final small bugs that might only effect 5% of the user base. As PCLinuxOS has proven many times over…it’s about perfection. This means that the release is up to the developers. The other nice thing about the rolling release cycle is that there are no set dates to releasing. This has always been the way PCLinuxOS is released as many of us that have been with it since the early days can attest to. With this type of cycle, updates are continuously applied to the software repository so much so that after a bit of time, a snapshot of the repository would constitute a new release…say 2007.01 or something similar. Allow me a bit of time to show you the method in my madness on this one. However, I think PCLinuxOS has a unique approach to releases and updates. Not to take away from a distribution that sets a release cycle…I understand that normal release cycles are a must with companies and software engineering. In my opinion, this is the most attractive and positive aspects of the small distribution. During distro comparisons, many call a lack of release cycle for PCLinuxOS one of its negative aspects.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |